No, I don't think I will
But nice try.
Whole bunch of folks are sanctimoniously asserting that we should all just stop mentioning Joe Biden’s cancer diagnosis.
Hmm.
No.
There are two main reasons why we should continue to discuss the cancer diagnosis of the former President of the United States:
First off — he was the President of the United States, arguably the most important patient in the world. For the physician attending the most powerful and watched man in the world to not discover this until it had already metastasized to his bones means said physician is guilty of malpractice, and dereliction of care — and should be struck from the registry, before being criminally investigated.
Ian, that’s kind of harsh, don’t you think?
I’m 58. My primary care physician added the PSA1 screen to my semi-annual bloodwork the year I turned 50. At 54 I was introduced to Dr. SausageFingers, who — every year — neglects to warm up his tube of KY before performing That Thing We Don’t Talk About.
And I’m a busted-up retired cop with crappy insurance, not the Leader of the Free World. Joe Biden is an 82-year-old male. For a doctor with such a high-profile male patient to not test rigorously and frequently for the single-most common male specific cancer on this little blue marble is medical negligence of the highest degree.
Let me perfectly clear here: If it is true that Joe Biden’s physician is so bloody incompetent that he did not find this cancer prior to it making Stage 4 and spreading to the bones, then he needs to be horse-whipped around the National Mall, if not crucified above the Reflecting Pool.
The other reason is … they did know. And this is, I’m afraid, the worse of the two options, because it is yet another scam/con game run on the trust of the American people by Democratic politicians, aided and abetted by alleged political pundits and a willing Legacy Media.
If they did know, then a whole bunch of crucifixions need to pop up around that Reflecting Pool, with Dr Mrs The President as the centrepiece.
I’m afraid — given the past history of lies2, deceitfulness3, and hypocrisy4 around the Biden Presidency — that the second reason is the more likely of the two.
Joseph Biden has cancer. The Democratic politicians around him, the White House staffers around him, the Legacy Media around him, and countless others around him … do not have cancer.
This is yet another scandal around the Biden Presidency, it is yet another assault on the faith of the American people in their elected government, and it is elder abuse — plain and simple. You don’t get to hide it behind sanctimoniousness and hypocrisy.
So, no. I don’t believe that I’ll just let this one die quietly.
Ian
Prostate Specific Antigen
“The withdrawal from Afghanistan could not have been handled better!”
“Mentally sharp as a tack!”
“I won’t pardon Hunter!”
Scribbler asked "what do you as a medical professional think about the claim that Biden's cancer was just discovered? What are the chances?"
ScribblersDad: "Slim and none."
I suspect this was a callous attempt to generate sympathy near the release of a very damning book. POTUS, who gets scanned, probed, and examined on the regular by what is supposed to be top talent had an undiscovered (for likely a decade or so) aggressive malignancy?
Codswallop.
If Biden was unable to serve,which between this medical issue and his state of mind could be argued, and if there was a coverup, which could be argued, then the coverup had a most important effect, namely it prevented Kamala Harris from ascending to the Presidency. That was a silent coup. Cynics will note an association between suggestions that Biden's positions as a younger politician were racist and the effect of the coup, namely preventing a Black Female from becoming President.